ALEXANDRIA, Va. – January 23, 2006-- In comments filed Friday with TSA, the airport-driven Registered Traveler Interoperability Consortium (RTIC)
and its Service Provider Council agreed on the financial standards, technical
interoperability standards and common business processes for the Registered
Traveler (RT) Program. The six month effort that culminated in Friday’s
recommendations provides a consensus framework for rapid, secure, and seamless
deployment of a registered traveler program at the nation’s airports that
brings both enhanced security and quicker security processing. The RTIC and its
Service Provider Council is a group of over 70 airports and 30 service
providers that are working to define and establish the mutual and common
business practices and technical standards that will complement federal
standards and help push forward a national Registered Traveler program.
“The agreement between
airports and industry on fundamental RT standards is critical to the long-term
success of the Registered Traveler Program,” AAAE President Chip Barclay
said. “Undoubtedly, the best path forward is one in which federal resources
and standards are combined with the knowledge, expertise and creativity of
airports, technology and aviation businesses,” he continued.
The
group recommends:
Financial Standards
The
RTIC proposes a dual-fee business model supporting: (1) enrollment and
enablement/activation of a RT participant into the system, and (2) verification
fee recovery based on RT participant usage.
This
model offers a simplistic and straight-forward approach to enabling the maximum
flexibility and competition for solutions for both enrollment and verification
service providers. It creates the most effective market for cost-effective and
innovative solutions and enables the broadest access to participant markets,
thereby maximizing potential participation. The proposed business model also
minimizes underlying cost of infrastructure and interoperability through the
provision of a single, regulated, high volume common services component, known
as the Registered Traveler Management System. Finally, it provides for a
competitive business environment to encourage financially viable verification
solutions in airport markets.
Technical Operability
Technical operability is the key to deploying a national
interoperable Registered Traveler Program across multiple airports, airlines
and a large, diverse traveler population. The RTIC makes specific technical
recommendations on:
- System
Messaging.
Specifications must be developed to ensure that all message formats and
delivery mechanisms are defined and understood by all parties. Messages
that cross domain boundaries are ones that affect the inter operability of
the program.
- Ensuring a
Chain of Trust It is
imperative that a chain of trust be established across the entire
lifecycle of RT. This chain of trust ensures the integrity of identity
data from collection right though to use in a verification kiosk (which
could be fixed, moveable or even a mobile terminal). Trust must be
established in all phases of the credentialing workflow as security
systems are only as strong as their weakest link.
- Optimizing
the Use of Biometrics. The
use of biometrics as a form of person-authentication is critical to
deploying a successful registered traveler program. However, biometric
technologies have unique characteristics to be considered in areas such as
interoperability and it is important to implement effective acquisition
quality measures and utilize industry standards to the greatest extent
possible.
- Leveraging
Appropriate Token Technologies. In an interoperable RT, every service provider
must be able to work with every other service provider’s tokens. This
includes not only being able to read the card, but to establish a level of
trust in the card and contents of the card (i.e., the biometric data and
claim of identity).
- Ensuring
System Security. A
key requirement for any RT program is to protect the integrity of the
program overall and each of the components within it. Messages must be
secured (private information encrypted, end points authenticated, etc.).
- Protecting
Privacy. Protecting
the privacy of the individual at all times is key to the successful
adoption of an RT program by the travelling public.
- Ensuring
Cross-Provider Interoperability. It is important that a mechanism be developed to ensure all
service providers can interoperate. As new service providers join the
program, a fair mechanism must exist that allows them to ensure that they
interoperate with all others prior to them issuing RT tokens.
Common Business Processes
Airports plan to contract
with RT service providers through competitive selection processes at each
individual airport. Airports may choose fully-functional service providers,
which provide a complete solution with all the functionality associated with a
RT service provider, including enrollment, issuance and verification. Or,
airports may choose separate service providers for each essential function.
Airports will have the discretion to select the model most appropriate for
their particular operation.
The
key players in a national, interoperable RT program and their roles and
responsibilities are detailed in the Common Business Processes response. The
following is a brief overview:
1) Enrollment service
provider: RT service provider that collects the biographical and biometric
information from RT applicants, collects the enrollment fee from RT applicants,
and issues RT cards to RT participants;
2) Verification service
provider: RT service provider that verifies the identity of the RT participant
at the verification station in the airport, may be the same as the enrollment
service provider;
3) Registered Traveler
Management System (RTMS): Performs duplicate checks, acts as the vetting
interface to TSA, maintains and distributes the Credential Revocation list, and
generates the biometric payload for RT cards
4) Transportation Security
Administration (TSA): Responsible for security threat assessments of RT
applicants, certification of RT service providers and overall oversight of the
RT program;
5) Applicant and
participant: Applicant refers to individuals who have voluntarily supplied
biographical and biometric data to a RT service provider. Participant refers
to individuals who have voluntarily supplied biographical and biometric data to
a RT service provider and have received an acceptable security threat
assessment from TSA and are recognized as Registered Travelers at airports.
The RTIC is committed to
working closely with TSA to meet the agency’s self imposed timeline through the
agency’s pledge to: use a public-private partnership model, build off of existing security networks through utilization of the
Transportation Security Clearinghouse, establish a
sustainable, biometrically enabled and interoperable system, and establish a program where travelers will receive
screening benefits through in-depth background checks.
The RTIC represents a
significant attempt by a large group in the airport community to partner with
TSA in making the promise of RT a reality as quickly as possible. More
information on the RTIC is available online at http://www.rtconsortium.com/.
RTIC Members
|
Airport Roster
|
Albany International Airport
Atlantic City International Airport
Baltimore-Washington International Airport
Bangor International Airport
Barkley Regional Airport
Blue Grass Airport
Boston Logan International Airport
Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport Authority
Daytona Beach International Airport
Denver International Airport
Des Moines International Airport
Dickinson Theodore Roosevelt Regional Airport
Flagstaff Pulliam Airport
Fort Wayne International Airport
Ft. Lauderdale—Hollywood International Airport
General Mitchell International Airport
Grand Forks Regional Airport Authority
Greater Orlando
Aviation Authority
Greater Rockford Airport
Authority
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
Houston Airport System
Huntsville International Airport
Jackson Hole Airport
Kalamazoo/Battle Creek
International Airport
Kent County Department of
Aeronautics
Lafayette Regional Airport
Lambert-St. Louis International Airport
Lihue Airport
Louisville International Airport
Manchester Airport
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority
Metropolitan Knoxville Airport Authority
Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority
Metropolitan Washington
Airports Authority’s Reagan National and Dulles International Airports
|
Miami International Airport
Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Airport
Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport
Monterey Peninsula Airport
Myrtle Beach International Airport
Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport
Northwestern Regional Airport
Commission
Palm Beach International Airport
Palm Springs International Airport
Peninsula Airport Commission
Philadelphia International Airport
Phoenix Sky Harbor
Pittsburgh International Airport
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Port Columbus International Airport
Port of Seattle/SEA_TAC International Airport
Pullman-Moscow Regional Airport
Redding Municipal Airport
Redmond Airport
Reno Tahoe Airport Authority
Rhode Island Airport
Corporation
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
San Francisco International Airport
Santa Barbara Airport
Shenandoah Valley Regional Airport
Tallahassee Regional Airport
Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport
Tucson Airport Authority
Tupelo Regional Airport
Waco Regional Airport
Wayne County Airport Authority
Wichita Airport Authority
Wilmington International Airport
Yeager Airport
|
|
|
Service Provider Council
|
|
A4Vision
ActivCard Inc.
American Express
ARINC
BearingPoint
Carter&Burgess
Cogent Systems
Competech SmartCard
Covenant Aviation
CrossMatch Technologies
Computer Sciences Corp
.
|
Daon
DayJet Corporation
Design Systems, Inc EDS
GE Security
Gemplus Corp.
ICTS Technologies USA
ID Technology Partners
IDENTIFiD INC
Identix, Inc.
Ingersoll-Rand Security
|
ImageWare Systems
Iridian Technologies, Inc.
Laser Data Command
Liska Biometry
Lockheed Martin Magnetic
Automation MAXIMUS
Nortel Government
Northrop Grumman
Oki – Biometric Solutions
Oracle
OSS Nokalva, Inc.
|
Panasonic Systems Raytheon
Saflink Corporation
Sagem Morpho Inc.
Semagix
SITA Information Network
Computing USA
Unisys
Verified Identity Pass
Viisage Technology
Yankee & Associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|